The Art of Pricing Loans (Last of a Series)

https://theleadpc.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/cropped-THE-LEAD-ICON.png
Content hub / Article / Commentary / The Art of Pricing Loans (Last of a Series)

Last week we noted the coincidence between “Pi Day” and the birth date of Albert Einstein, but pondered any π connection with that other March 14 celebrity, Billy Crystal. One astute TLL reader (and keen observer of the pop scene) solved that riddle for us: Https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmha1NsQRU. Well done.

In closing out our series on loan pricing, we also promised our readers a brief primer on key ingredients of pricing itself. Let’s start with the most obvious: Libor spread.

Term loans are priced with a set spread over Libor, say 400 bps. But which Libor? The borrower typically can choose among several options as detailed in each credit agreement, ranging from 30 to 180 days. Revolving credits carry both a Libor spread (on the drawn amount) and a commitment fee (on the undrawn amount) of 50 bps for leveraged borrowers.

A related mechanism is the Libor floor. Born of the credit crisis, floors were introduced by arrangers as a subsidy to lenders when Libor plummeted from 4% to near zero. Floors were set initially around 2-3% so that when combined with actual Libor, the overall yield stayed relatively steady. As markets loosened and underwriting became more competitive, floors tightened. Despite fears they would disappear altogether, with the exception of some bank-only facilities for less-leveraged companies, that hasn’t happened. Floors are around 1% today.

A third component of pricing is upfront fees. These are the share of the underwriting fee – paid from the borrower to the arranger – passed along to the syndicate banks (or in the case of “best efforts” executions, paid directly to the lenders by the borrower). Upfront fees are market-dependent. Immediately post-crisis that percent was in the 2-3% range, significantly higher than the 0-1% range we’re at today.

Many institutional investors are unable to take income as fees without triggering significant “originator” tax issues. That’s where OID comes in.

Originally a feature of the bond market, the mechanics of OID, or original issue discount, are simple. Instead of coming out of the arrangers’ pocket, the “fee” is paid by the issuer as a discount to the original financing. For example, a $100 million loan with a 99 OID means the borrower gets $99 million and the syndicate receives $1 million.

Once terms are settled and allocations to each account are communicated, the loan is free to be traded in the secondary market. Depending on current market pricing, the price/value of the loan “on the break” may be up or down from the initial 99 OID. Secondary activity on the name could be at 100 (par) or even higher.

Where new and existing issues trade is a key indicator of market tone closely scrutinized by arrangers. Like canaries in the capital markets coal mine, secondary prices help establish clearing pricing for newly structured transactions.

As a footnote, upfront fees for middle market deals tend to be higher relative to broadly syndicated ones. Private equity sponsors often seek to club up smaller loans with relationship lenders. Ensuring their participation costs more than a general syndication.

 

Attention Subscribers! Our Lead Left Special Report: Why BDCs Matter will be available for download the week of March 30.

 

Business development companies and the rise of balance sheet financing vehicles

Podcast

Business development companies and the rise of balance sheet financing vehicles

Fitch's Deb Murnin and Chelsea Richardson discuss the growing use of off-balance-sheet JVs and finance companies among BDCs, exploring the drivers, leverage impacts, portfolio risk profiles, and potential rating implications for Fitch-rated BDCs.
Listen
Private Debt Investor New York Forum

September 15-16, Hudson Yards, New York

Private Debt Investor New York Forum

Bringing together the investors, managers and advisers shaping the next phase of the market — 200+ allocators and $10.6 trillion of LP capital expected. Benchmark strategies, hear from leading LPs, and cut through market noise over two unmissable days.
Learn more
US Private Credit League Tables H1'26

Report

US Private Credit League Tables H1'26

The definitive rankings covering private credit activity in H1'26.
Download
PitchBook's Q2 2026 US PE Breakdown

Report

PitchBook's Q2 2026 US PE Breakdown

Software freezes and energy powers on as US PE deal value falls 38% in Q2 2026.
Download
Making sense of private credit defaults

Webinar

Making sense of private credit defaults

What does private credit default data really tell us? Join our exclusive webinar featuring experts from KBRA, Moody's, Fitch Ratings, and S&P Global to find out.
Register

Latest news

    Rate hike expectations ease as term SOFR curve flattens

    The CME six-month Term SOFR rate reached a recent high of 3.979% on July 28 before retreating to 3.837% as…

    Read More

    3Q26: New loan assets rise to 44% of total lending, a 3-year high

    New loan assets as a proportion of total US loan volume make up 44% of the 3Q26 pipeline to date,…

    Read More

    North American GPs dominant as fundraising accelerates

    Our PEI Private Credit 200 ranking also shows capital raising increasing overall – and accelerating especially fast for the largest…

    Read More