Construction Delays

PB icon
Content hub / Article / PitchBook / Construction Delays

Download PitchBook’s report click here.

Last week we highlighted our recent buy-and-build research, which found, among other things, that PE hold periods are significantly impacted by add-on deals. On average, platforms with add-on acquisitions take about one year longer to exit versus bare-bones platforms. That, in turn, has helped pushed out PE holding times to around five years on a median basis, up from around three to four years in the leadup to the financial crisis. “Strip and flip” is clearly a thing of the past.

Add-on data offers a unique glimpse into the rapid transformation of the PE industry, which historically has moved at a glacial pace. The accompanying chart shows the median time between platform acquisitions and add-ons, split out between the first add-ons done (bottom blue line) and the most recent add-ons for the same platforms (top green line). It’s become common for PE sponsors to identify potential add-on acquisitions before buying their platform; in fact, it’s now necessary in the most competitive cases. That said, the push to add on quickly isn’t as new a phenomenon as many believe; it appears to have begun very quickly after the crisis, in fact. On a median basis, sponsors have waited about a year or less to add on going back to 2011. Given the time it takes to close any acquisition, the one-year mark can be rounded down closer to zero, or at least to the “first hundred days” mark.

On the other side of the coin, the time taken for second-and-later add-ons went down a different path in the same timeframe. In the aftermath of the crisis, late-cycle add-ons were done more than four years after the original platforms were acquired. We posit that, due to macroeconomic headwinds and post-crisis performance issues, PE sponsors turned to add-ons to boost platform revenues in a low-growth environment. And as we’ve discussed with the software space, late-cycle add-ons are often done to expand the platform’s offerings in response to ever-changing consumer demands. While both of those points have visibly contributed to the “most recent” add-on data, the numbers have been trending downward since 2013. The broader takeaway is that even late-cycle add-ons are being completed earlier today compared to 2008-2012. In other words, the buy-and-build strategy is much more deliberate—i.e. less reactionary—in the current market.

Contact: Alex Lykken
alex.lykken@pitchbook.com

Contact Alex Lykken
PitchBook's Q3 2026 US PE Middle Market Report

Report

PitchBook's Q3 2026 US PE Middle Market Report

The middle market is back on track.
Download
US Private Credit League Tables 9M'26

Report

US Private Credit League Tables 9M'26

The definitive rankings covering private credit activity in 9M'26.
Download

Latest news

    Share of PE middle-market deal count by backing type

    Add-ons remain the workhorse for middle-market deployment, accounting for 67. 1% of all middle-market transactions YTD, in line with activity seen in recent years.

    Read More

    Software deal share falls in middle markets, rises in large caps

    In Q3’26 software’s share of total deals fell in both the Lower Middle Market (to 7%) and Upper Middle Market (to 9%), while Large Cap saw a modest uptick in share to 8%.

    Read More

    Secondary loan prices stabilize following steep declines

    Secondary loan prices came under significant pressure through September and October, with the Bloomberg U.S. Leveraged Loan Index declining 119…

    Read More